Hot water cylinder - 1 or 2 cold feeds from loft?
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 2:21 pm
Hi
Looking for advice please. Is there benefit having 2 x 22mm cold feeds from loft CWS tank(s) into same direct vented HWS cylinder? This set-up I inherited with a feed either side at the bottom but am looking to have the HWS cylinder moved and replaced.
Have any of you come across such before and are there any benefits it provides? One reason for asking is that I have had two different views from plumbers – one “leave as is”, the other “its overkill”!
Let me explain further!
Our property has a Direct Vented HWS Cylinder over 30 years old. I want to relocate this but will buy new due to its age/condition etc. The cylinder is not used for heating – there is no gas, only electric storage heaters. Due to previous point, I am happy to stick with a gravity fed direct vented system.
The current HWS cylinder is 150cm x 40cm and has top draw off as well as a dedicated connection for a pumped shower on the front.
However, what is different are 2 large CWS tanks in the loft (both >200L) and 2 x 22mm cold water feeds - 1 from each CWS tank which are interconnected - into the bottom of the same HWS cylinder – one either side.
Previous owners had a 4.0 bar pump which fed a bespoke shower unit with ceiling and side jets – aka it used a fair amount of water hence the 4.0 bar pump and 2 x cold feeds.
We now have a more simple installation - a Mira Vision Pumped Shower – this recommends CWS tank of >230L. The maximum flow rate of the shower is 16L/minute but this can operate at same time as bath fill/other household use.
I don’t envisage wanting something as powerful as 4.0 bar again. Is there any advantage having 2 x 22mm cold feeds into the HWS cylinder – and keeping the 2 large CWS tanks in the loft? I was looking at ‘downsizing’ to 1 x CWS tank in the loft – either 50 Gallon/227L or 70 Gallon/318L.
I understand the 22mm feed from CWS can flow at ~0.6L/sec (36L/minute) so this seems to be sufficient to replenish the HWS cylinder if there are multiple concurrent uses? Otherwise, would it be better to consider 28mm feed from the CWS tank?
Thanks for your help.
Looking for advice please. Is there benefit having 2 x 22mm cold feeds from loft CWS tank(s) into same direct vented HWS cylinder? This set-up I inherited with a feed either side at the bottom but am looking to have the HWS cylinder moved and replaced.
Have any of you come across such before and are there any benefits it provides? One reason for asking is that I have had two different views from plumbers – one “leave as is”, the other “its overkill”!
Let me explain further!
Our property has a Direct Vented HWS Cylinder over 30 years old. I want to relocate this but will buy new due to its age/condition etc. The cylinder is not used for heating – there is no gas, only electric storage heaters. Due to previous point, I am happy to stick with a gravity fed direct vented system.
The current HWS cylinder is 150cm x 40cm and has top draw off as well as a dedicated connection for a pumped shower on the front.
However, what is different are 2 large CWS tanks in the loft (both >200L) and 2 x 22mm cold water feeds - 1 from each CWS tank which are interconnected - into the bottom of the same HWS cylinder – one either side.
Previous owners had a 4.0 bar pump which fed a bespoke shower unit with ceiling and side jets – aka it used a fair amount of water hence the 4.0 bar pump and 2 x cold feeds.
We now have a more simple installation - a Mira Vision Pumped Shower – this recommends CWS tank of >230L. The maximum flow rate of the shower is 16L/minute but this can operate at same time as bath fill/other household use.
I don’t envisage wanting something as powerful as 4.0 bar again. Is there any advantage having 2 x 22mm cold feeds into the HWS cylinder – and keeping the 2 large CWS tanks in the loft? I was looking at ‘downsizing’ to 1 x CWS tank in the loft – either 50 Gallon/227L or 70 Gallon/318L.
I understand the 22mm feed from CWS can flow at ~0.6L/sec (36L/minute) so this seems to be sufficient to replenish the HWS cylinder if there are multiple concurrent uses? Otherwise, would it be better to consider 28mm feed from the CWS tank?
Thanks for your help.