What constitutes 'starting' a build for planning purposes?
If you want to know how your DIY projects could be affected by building and planning regulations, click here to post questions and view answers

4 posts   •   Page 1 of 1
davidb2000
Labourer
Labourer
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:37 pm

What constitutes 'starting' a build for planning purposes?

by davidb2000 » Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:55 pm

I have planning permission for a 2 holiday cabins on my land and need to start the build within the 3 year time limit. However, I want to do the minimum possible amount of work to satisfy the requirement, as I have no intention of completing the build at this time, but want to preserve the permission. Local council say this is fine in principle but are very vague about what constitutes a 'start'.
Would it be ok to just dig the drainage, for example? I'd prefer not to have to lay foundations, because then I would be left looking at ugly concrete footings.
Thanks.

bd3cc
Foreman
Foreman
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:02 pm

by bd3cc » Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:15 pm

I would think it is possibly the 1st phase that needs to be inspected by BC.
This could be the trenches for the footings. Personnally doubt that it would be the drainage, as this needs to be pressure tested.
You should have a list of where BC needs to inspect, but in the long run, it could be cheaper to renew the permission after 3 yrs

kbrownie
Project Manager
Project Manager
Posts: 1995
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:36 pm

by kbrownie » Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:44 am

i'd hold back the work for two and half years, then reconsider my options.
KB

holboob
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:46 am

by holboob » Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:50 pm

in my experience it is minimum of the foundations being laid

thanks

4 posts   •   Page 1 of 1