Hi all
Newby just wondering if anyone has experienced anything like the hassle i have and if so - is there anything to be done to prevent recurrence of events for others?!
Its like this: i made an application for planning on my garden in 2006 which was refused and little info was given as to why precisely, ever since i have been trying to get the planning. You might say give up! but the plan is for a new property on the garden of my in village home and a rebuild of the bungalow i live in. I have (finally) got the new dwelling planning granted - hoorah! but the replacement dwelling is now proving difficult as goal posts keep moving.
The garden plot application included surveys for bats, dormice, sac pollution prevention mitigation scheme,, dormouse mitigation scheme, bat mitigation scheme..... <long list here!>
The garden and house are obviously near to each other - 15 yards apart or so.The planners (or their ecologists) are now requesting new surveys for the house demolition regarding bats.... i have had two surveys done for bats, but as a direct result of the planners and ecologists missing their own deadlines and being obstructive the initial survey has expired.
They also stated they wanted new surveys for hedgerow moving.... (+eps mitigation) AND specific info on dormice in survey form, we have just been given permission for this with the plot so i am at a loss as to why the new replacement house application needs further info with at! what's changed!?!
They also want renewed sac mitigation scheme, again only passed with the plot consent months ago....!
Can i make them cover costs for the new bat survey to make a point, even if retrospectively?
There time wasting, bad advice, delay tactics, contradictory statements and general incompetence have cost me and others in the area a good deal of hard earned money. Are there any comebacks for this sort of behavior for such public sector cowboys? in the private sector like a lot of us they would have all been fired an age ago!
To illustrate it's not individual angst driving this....... I know one chap who applied for a wing turbine consent in the same LPA area - it was granted, planners later revoked the planning after he had spent lots(?) of thousands preparing/building. He now may have to sell his home to pay debts as a direct result of the withdrawal. This withdrawal was a direct result of planners and ecologists not sticking to the rules and winging it to establish requirements/needs for the consent to be granted. So the planning given was not worth the paper it was printed on.
This local planning authority is incompetent, outside their own guidelines perpetually and generally not providing the service they are established to on any level. Its easier to get permission on the adjacent national park which is supposed to be more restrictive, not less..... Sigh!
This also generally speaking the opinion of the planning consultant that i have had to engage to assist with the application.
Thoughts or similar experiences anyone......?